| ing that fetal distress is a dangerous complication | | | | precipitously dropped to dangerously low levels. At |
| in pregnancy that frequently entails a diminished | | | | that point the nurse finally informed another |
| oxygen supply to the unborn baby. Fetal distress | | | | obstetrician at the hospital of the situation. As |
| often comes about after the unborn child's | | | | soon as he was apprised of the situation this |
| oxygen supply is somehow significantly reduced. | | | | obstetrician did not hesitate to do an emergency |
| Fetal distress is spotted by monitoring the unborn | | | | C-section. On doing the procedure the doctor |
| child's heart rate. Under particular circumstances, | | | | determined that the baby had been deprived of |
| such as when the heart rate drops below a | | | | oxygen (which accounted for the fall in the heart |
| specified level, fast action like an emergency | | | | rate) on account of a placental abruption. |
| C-section is required. This article examines a | | | | The physician had information that the patient |
| reported medical malpractice claim where there | | | | was being transported to the second hospital and |
| was a lapse of about 2 hours. | | | | expected her obstetrician to meet her there. |
| In this case an expectant mother who had fallen | | | | However, instead of go to the hospital as he |
| was being taken to a hospital to check that there | | | | stated he would do, the physician went home. |
| was no injury to her unborn child. The patient had | | | | This would not have been a problem if the |
| undergone an ultrasound at the hospital in order to | | | | obstetrician had informed the staff at the second |
| look for any harm to her baby and the ultrasound | | | | hospital of this choice. Believing the physician was |
| had been interpreted as displaying no injuries. The | | | | heading toward the hospital the nurse at the |
| doctor agreed to meet his patient at a second | | | | second hospital, who might normally have instantly |
| hospital where she was going to be transported | | | | advised a different obstetrician of the fetal |
| to have other monitoring which the first hospital | | | | distress, did nothing but continue to wait for a |
| was not properly set up to carry out. | | | | doctor who would never appear. |
| When at the second hospital a fetal heart rate | | | | At birth the newborn was non-responsive. Despite |
| monitor was connected to the woman. The labor | | | | the fact that the medical staff attempted |
| and delivery nurse at this hospital interpreted the | | | | resuscitative measures they were not able to |
| strip as non-reassuring and revealing that the | | | | revive the baby. The law firm that handled the |
| unborn child was experiencing fetal distress. Given | | | | case was able to state that they accomplished a |
| that the patient's doctor had indicated he would | | | | settlement totaling $750,000 on behalf of the |
| meet his patient there, the nurse resolved that | | | | child's parents. As this claim displays, a physician |
| the correct plan would be to hold out for the | | | | who agrees to follow up on the care of the |
| obstetrician to turn up, even as she observed | | | | patient and does not might be liable for |
| that the fetal distress was worsening. | | | | malpractice and a nurse who fails to inform a |
| The nurse continued to wait for the doctor to | | | | physician or take other proper measures right |
| appear for two hours. She kept waiting until the | | | | away on observing signs of a critical complication |
| monitor suggested that the baby's heart rate had | | | | in the pregnancy might also be liable. |