Turbo Lag

In any discussion about turbocharging, the issue ofincreased the possibility of reversion. In essence, it
turbo lag is sure to rear its ugly head. For many,reduced the engine's volumetric efficiency, further
turbo lag is a major issue but the issue of turborobbing the engine of power and performance.
lag is greatly misunderstood. No, turbo lag is not aAgain, these deficiencies in performance were
myth, and yes, it does exist - in technical terms,only overcome when the turbo started producing
turbo lag can be defined as the time it takes thepost pressure.
turbo to spin fast enough to produce boostWith a much lower compression ratio, increased
pressure. However, it is not as bad as mostback pressure and reduced volumetric efficiency,
people believe.an OEM turbocharged vehicle was often out
The problem originates in the 1980s when turbosperformed by its naturally aspirated brethren in
and superchargers became so popular thatthose precious few seconds while the turbo
several marques started producing OEM turbospooled up to spin fast enough to produce boost
vehicles like the 1983 Nissan EXA Turbo and thepressure. Once the turbo spooled up and started
Mitsubishi Colt 1600 Turbo. With these vehicles,creating boost pressure, it more than
the issue of cost and reliability was morecompensated for the deficiencies caused by the
important than performance. In a sense the turbolowered compression ratio and lowered volumetric
was more of a marketing gimmick as a 78 kWefficiency.
turbocharged 1500cc motor cannot be describedBut today, with the advances in turbo technology
as a performance vehicle.and the use of an intercooler to remove some of
There are two things these manufacturers did tothe heat that is a natural side effect of
give turbo lag a bad name: to minimize costs theycompressing air, it is not necessary to lower the
produced turbocharged vehicles withoutcompression ratio. Indeed, with the proper use of
intercoolers and then, to deal with the increasedan intercooler turbocharging has become a bolt-on
temperatures of the compressed air that wasaccessory with no need to open the engine. Also,
pumped into the combustion chamber, and tobecause you don't need to get boost pressure so
minimize detonation, they lowered the engine'squickly, you can run a slightly larger turbo that is
compression ratio. The Nissan EXA Turbo, forbetter suited to the exhaust system and
example has a compression ratio of 7.4:1produces far less back pressure. This effectively
compare to the normally aspirated engine'stakes turbo lag out of the equation. Even though
compression ratio of 9.0:1! This robbed the enginethe turbo will still have turbo lag, the engine's
of power and performance that was notpower and performance is not compromised by
compensated for by the turbo until the turbolowered compression ratios and increased
spooled up and started producing boost pressure!backpressure.
Fortunately, these vehicles were also fitted withSo the use of a properly sized and efficient
small turbos so they spooled up quickly enough,intercooler should be a compulsory part of any
but the small turbo also contributed toturbocharger system if you do not want to
backpressure in the exhaust system. Thissuffer the consequences of turbo lag.
affected the exhaust's scavenging ability and